US mortgage lender closes doors after capital warning
Indymac Bancorp, one of the largest mortgage providers in the US, closed its doors to new business and announced deep job cuts yesterday, blaming the continuing crisis in the mortgage-backed securities market.
In a letter to stakeholders, chief executive Michael Perry said the Pasadena-based lender's regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), has "advised us that we are no longer well-capitalised". In May, the lender reported $184.2 million in losses for the first quarter of the year, warning that "we do not expect that Indymac will be able to return to overall profitability until the current decline in home prices decelerates". Losses for the second quarter will be larger still, Perry said - this contrasts with his forecasts in May of declining quarterly losses for the rest of the year.
In other ways, too, the lender seems to have underestimated the severity of the continuing mortgage crisis. It has failed to raise new capital this quarter as it planned, Perry said, and continuing illiquidity and wide spreads in the mortgage-backed security market mean that selling off assets "would actually deplete capital further".
The OTS decision means Indymac will no longer be able to accept new deposits, and it will close its doors to new mortgage business and lay off 3,800 of its 7,200 workers, focussing instead on servicing existing loans, its Financial Freedom reverse mortgage unit, and its existing retail banking operation in California. Regulators ordered Indymac to close to new business in order to shrink its balance sheet, as an alternative to selling off assets at fire-sale prices, Perry said.
The lender left the Alt-A mortgage business in 2007, deciding to focus on 'conforming' mortgages, which can be sold on to government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The GSEs, however, are themselves struggling - they posted massive first-quarter losses in May, and both saw their shares drop, by 16% to $15.74 and 18% to $11.91 respectively, yesterday after press and analyst reports suggested accounting changes could compel them to raise up to $75 billion in new capital
See also: $2.2 billion loss as Fannie Mae mortgage purchases continue
Call of duty
GSEs could endanger US credit rating
Subprime and punishment
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say