US mortgage lender closes doors after capital warning
Indymac Bancorp, one of the largest mortgage providers in the US, closed its doors to new business and announced deep job cuts yesterday, blaming the continuing crisis in the mortgage-backed securities market.
In a letter to stakeholders, chief executive Michael Perry said the Pasadena-based lender's regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), has "advised us that we are no longer well-capitalised". In May, the lender reported $184.2 million in losses for the first quarter of the year, warning that "we do not expect that Indymac will be able to return to overall profitability until the current decline in home prices decelerates". Losses for the second quarter will be larger still, Perry said - this contrasts with his forecasts in May of declining quarterly losses for the rest of the year.
In other ways, too, the lender seems to have underestimated the severity of the continuing mortgage crisis. It has failed to raise new capital this quarter as it planned, Perry said, and continuing illiquidity and wide spreads in the mortgage-backed security market mean that selling off assets "would actually deplete capital further".
The OTS decision means Indymac will no longer be able to accept new deposits, and it will close its doors to new mortgage business and lay off 3,800 of its 7,200 workers, focussing instead on servicing existing loans, its Financial Freedom reverse mortgage unit, and its existing retail banking operation in California. Regulators ordered Indymac to close to new business in order to shrink its balance sheet, as an alternative to selling off assets at fire-sale prices, Perry said.
The lender left the Alt-A mortgage business in 2007, deciding to focus on 'conforming' mortgages, which can be sold on to government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The GSEs, however, are themselves struggling - they posted massive first-quarter losses in May, and both saw their shares drop, by 16% to $15.74 and 18% to $11.91 respectively, yesterday after press and analyst reports suggested accounting changes could compel them to raise up to $75 billion in new capital
See also: $2.2 billion loss as Fannie Mae mortgage purchases continue
Call of duty
GSEs could endanger US credit rating
Subprime and punishment
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion
Iosco chief sees no need for CCPs to hold more capital
CCPs have shown resilience in volatile times without extra skin-in-the-game, says Buenaventura