SEC’s Atkins slams hedge fund rule again
Paul Atkins, a commissioner at the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has renewed his criticism of the regulator’s hedge fund registration rule – due to go into effect in February 2006.
Opponents of mandatory registration have argued that operational costs associated with registration will be passed on to investors in the form of higher fees, with little benefit in terms of investor protection.
And, according to Atkins, the SEC simply doesn’t have the resources to enable it to complete the examinations associated with registration. He believes the SEC’s efforts are disproportionate, given the relatively small number of investors in hedge funds. “I believe there are fewer than 100,000 investors in hedge funds – compared with the more than 90 million mutual fund investors,” said Atkins.
But Atkins went on to urge pragmatism, saying hedge funds should embrace the rule as it is already in place. According to the SEC commissioner, examiners at the Office of Compliance Inspection and Examination (OC) will soon begin in-depth hedge fund training sessions, some of which will be led by the MFA.
Parties wary of the SEC’s ability to keep closer tabs on hedge funds will not have been comforted by a report written by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) last month. The report questions the regulator’s ability to adequately oversee the mutual fund industry. As part of its oversight efforts, the OC randomly selects a sample of what it deems to be high-risk funds, alongside a smaller number of low-risk funds for examination.
Given constraints on resources, the GAO questioned the SEC’s capacity to examine mutual funds considered low risk within a 10-year period and to accurately identify funds that pose a higher risk and effectively target them for routine examination. The GAO suggested the SEC may be able to avoid becoming overstretched next year by modifying the registration rule so fewer hedge funds need register, and by gaining an increase in funding from the US Congress.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
BNP Paribas exec fears data drought from market’s IMA cuts
Vendors may not step up with critical inputs to support internal models under FRTB
Hong Kong rationalises swaps reporting requirements
Some duplicate fields removed, but framework still more granular than other jurisdictions
The curious case of the revealing orders
Oxford academics have found evidence pointing to collusion on a European exchange, but market-makers aren’t wholly convinced
FDIC’s McKernan wants single capital stack in Basel III endgame
Rebuffing Barr’s offer of a partial rollback, Republican director also targets op risk framework
European banks search for consensus on credit spread risk
New EBA guidelines spawn diverging interpretations of which products must be assessed for CSRBB
Dutch regulator in new push on algo manipulation
AFM teams up with Oxford Uni academics to develop data models that will identify “harmful” activity in automated trading
Fed relief plan for G-Sib agency clearing welcomed
Rollback may revive interest in European FCM model, as principal clearing still treated punitively
Indian initial margin launch brings operational headaches
Conglomerates with multiple entities trading derivatives pose compliance challenges for dealers