JP Morgan and Citigroup pass Enron blame to Andersen
Citigroup and JP Morgan Chase yesterday sought to shift blame on to auditor Andersen for its role in approving 'prepay' transactions, which masked Enron’s financial malaise.
Prepays are legitimate arrangements in which a company is paid in advance to deliver a service or product at a later date. But they did not stay legitimate with Enron, allege the subcommittee’s investigators, with banks such as JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup constructing complex, "phoney" prepays that resulted in Enron obtaining billions of dollars that “were in reality undisclosed loans” to Enron.
“During our business relationship with Enron, we thought we were dealing with honest managers who had a legitimate business purpose for the transactions we did with them,” said David Bushnell, Citigroup’s head of global risk management. “We believed Enron was making good-faith accounting judgments that were reviewed by Andersen, which was then the world’s premier auditing firm in this sector.”
Meanwhile, Jeffrey Dellapina, managing director in the credit and rates group at JP Morgan Chase, told investigators that prepaid forward contracts have been used for years as a proper tool to enable businesses to increase their liquidity and diversify their sources of funding. “There have been allegations in the media that the prepaid forward transactions were ‘disguised debt’ or a ‘disguised loan’,” said Dellapina. “The prepaid forwards were undoubtedly financing, as are all contracts that involve prepayment features, but every financing is not a loan. “These transactions had different features, benefits and risks than loans,” Dellapina added. “It is our understanding that Enron recorded these transactions on its balance sheet; in other words, they were not ‘off-balance sheet’ transactions.”
Dellapina said the manner in which Enron accounted for such transactions on its books of account and in its financial statements was a matter for Enron, its management and auditors.
Subcommittee investigators were unanimous in their chastisement of Citigroup and JP Morgan Chase. But they also said Barclays, Credit Suisse First Boston, FleetBoston, Royal Bank of Scotland and Toronto Dominion also participated in prepaid transactions worth more than $1 billion. “Many of the so-called prepays, in fact, were not prepaid forward contracts at all: they did not transfer price risk. They did not utilise independent third parties. They were not entered into because the purchaser actually wanted oil or gas. Nor were their terms driven by anything other than a desire to achieve an accounting end,” said Maine’s Republican Senator Susan Collins. “Instead, they were elaborate circular transactions that were designed to disguise what were essentially loans totalling billions of dollars,” she added.
Robert Roach, chief investigator of the subcommittee, warned that Enron was not the only company to obtain loans disguised as commodity trades. “Major financial institutions are knowingly assisting and even promoting such transactions," he claimed.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous