Fannie Mae issues statement on derivatives accounting policy
US mortgage agency Fannie Mae issued a statement today highlighting its policy on derivatives accounting, in a move to distance itself from the controversy that has enveloped rival mortgage agency, Freddie Mac.
"Fannie Mae made a permanent and irrevocable decision to become an SEC registrant when we filed our fully audited financial statements with our Form 10 and Form 10-K on March 31, 2003," said the statement. "The issues [on Freddie Mac] raised to date appear to be financial management and accounting policy issues that are within the purview of the SEC. Therefore Fannie Mae, as an SEC registrant, is subject to SEC oversight and enforcement with regard to such issues."
Freddie Mac has been under investigation by the SEC since January over its reporting of its derivatives earnings. The agency restated its earnings for 2000-2002 in January on the advice of its new auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers, which took over from Arthur Andersen. This has led to accusations that the agency deliberately smoothed its previous earnings statements through the use of its derivatives accounting policy.
Fannie Mae's statement today appears to be aimed at mollifying investors concerned that it may have done something similar. It also reiterates a statement made by Franklin Raines, chief executive of the mortgage agency, in January, which said: "We don't approach our hedging with a specific accounting result in mind."
Freddie Mac fired its chief operating officer, David Glenn, earlier this week, alleging that he had not fully co-operated with the SEC's enquiry. The SEC said it had found pages missing from Glenn's private diary.
It is unclear what information the missing pages contained, but some parties feared more problems may emerge. "The fact that three other people left at the same time as Glenn indicates that this is likely to be more than a personal issue," said one analyst, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are two of the largest participants in the US interest rate swaps market, which they use to hedge volatility related to their mortgage businesses.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance