Weill defends Citigroup's actions over Enron
Citigroup’s chief executive Sandy Weill yesterday defended his company's actions amid increased US government scrutiny into its relationship with bankrupt energy trader Enron.
Earlier this week, Citigroup and JP Morgan Chase sought to shift blame on to auditor Andersen for its role in approving 'prepay' transactions, which masked Enron’s financial malaise. Testifying to the US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the Wall Street powerhouses defended their six-year involvement in providing more than $8 billion in financing to Enron.
“Today’s investors are demanding greater transparency in financial disclosure, and therefore we are responding accordingly. By today’s new standards, and with the benefit of hindsight, we will evaluate client transactions in an entirely different light than in the past...If we find that anyone in our company has done anything wrong or fails to abide by our professional standards, we will take all appropriate actions swiftly,” Weill warned.
Accordingly, Citigroup is building stronger walls to separate research from investment banking and managing the conflicts that may arise from time to time, Weill added. The bank is also seeking to avoid possible conflicts of interest by not using its auditors to do consulting work.
“The recent decline in our stock price is completely disconnected from the fundamental strengths of our company. We earned a record $4.08 billion in the past three months alone. We have $92.5 billion in total equity and $10.5 billion in credit reserves,” Weill said. “The issues raised relate to a small segment of the corporate and investment bank and need to be put in the context of the diversity and breadth of Citigroup’s operations. In the past twelve months, we received ratings upgrades from major rating agencies, and are now rated one notch below AAA or equivalent.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”