Weill defends Citigroup's actions over Enron
Citigroup’s chief executive Sandy Weill yesterday defended his company's actions amid increased US government scrutiny into its relationship with bankrupt energy trader Enron.
Earlier this week, Citigroup and JP Morgan Chase sought to shift blame on to auditor Andersen for its role in approving 'prepay' transactions, which masked Enron’s financial malaise. Testifying to the US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the Wall Street powerhouses defended their six-year involvement in providing more than $8 billion in financing to Enron.
“Today’s investors are demanding greater transparency in financial disclosure, and therefore we are responding accordingly. By today’s new standards, and with the benefit of hindsight, we will evaluate client transactions in an entirely different light than in the past...If we find that anyone in our company has done anything wrong or fails to abide by our professional standards, we will take all appropriate actions swiftly,” Weill warned.
Accordingly, Citigroup is building stronger walls to separate research from investment banking and managing the conflicts that may arise from time to time, Weill added. The bank is also seeking to avoid possible conflicts of interest by not using its auditors to do consulting work.
“The recent decline in our stock price is completely disconnected from the fundamental strengths of our company. We earned a record $4.08 billion in the past three months alone. We have $92.5 billion in total equity and $10.5 billion in credit reserves,” Weill said. “The issues raised relate to a small segment of the corporate and investment bank and need to be put in the context of the diversity and breadth of Citigroup’s operations. In the past twelve months, we received ratings upgrades from major rating agencies, and are now rated one notch below AAA or equivalent.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos