Reliant settles with Ferc for up to $50m
The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Ferc) yesterday reached agreement with subsidiaries of Houston-based Reliant Resources to settle all its investigations in connection with its review of manipulation of the Californian energy markets. The proceeds of the settlement could total $50 million, the Ferc said.
Reliant did not admit to the violations in agreeing the settlement, which calls for the company to pay $15 million in cash within 30 days. Two more instalments of $5 million each are due by September 30, 2005, and September 30, 2006. As much as another $25 million could also be derived from Reliant’s auctioning of 824 megawatts of generation capacity over the next three years.
The settlement proceeds from the three annual auctions will be dependent upon market conditions, the Ferc said, but they will not exceed $25 million. California’s investor-owned and municipal utilities will have the right of first refusal for this low-cost capacity, the Ferc added. The settlement funds will be deposited into a special treasury fund for the benefit of California and western-US electricity customers, and the Ferc plans to address dispersal of those funds in a future proceeding.
The agreement also calls for strict reporting by Reliant to the Ferc’s Office of Market Oversight and Investigations of all sales for one year. Reliant is also required to retain all telephone conversation tapes of employees trading electricity for three years.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities
NBFI oversight ‘no longer adequate’, say BdF economists
Researchers call for stronger supervision of non-bank sector ‘before risks actually materialise’
Why Brexit still stirs up trouble for cross-border business
As EU erects another obstacle, banks consider ways around it – or exit strategies
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor