FSA sets out scope of Turner Review on bank regulation
Capital adequacy and liquidity regulation are in need of urgent review as a result of the financial crisis, according to the UK's Financial Services Authority (FSA).
The FSA yesterday released its annual Financial Risk Outlook (FRO), which outlines major risks facing firms, consumers and the regulatory system as a result of the financial crisis. Alistair Darling, the UK's Chancellor of the Exchequer, has asked the FSA's chairman Lord Adair Turner to undertake a comprehensive review on the future of bank regulation. According to yesterday's statement, the most significant parts of that review will centre on capital adequacy and liquidity regulation.
The regulator believes capital adequacy rules need to be reviewed to increase capital held against trading book assets and to mitigate market risk, and also stressed the need to introduce a counter-cyclical element to bank capital requirements so that adequate capital is held for both good and bad times. Inadequate capital requirements allowed banks to significantly increase leverage and credit exposures in the years leading up to the crisis, the FSA believes.
The FRO also states liquidity regulation needs to be reviewed to incorporate more effective supervisory processes, reporting requirements and risk management. On December 4, 2008, the regulator published a consultation paper, CP 08/22, which recommends that firms pay greater attention to the assessment and management of liquidity risk. The paper proposes that banks hold a "liquid assets buffer" of short-term government bonds to mitigate liquidity risk.
"Meeting these new requirements will mean significant improvements in some firms' internal analytical and liquidity risk management approaches will need to be made," the FSA said yesterday.
The Turner Review will also include analysis of credit rating agencies, fair value accounting and the arrangements for clearing of credit-default swaps. It is scheduled to be published by the end of March.
See also: Trading book capital must be "several times" higher, FSA saysFSA to order banks to stock up on Treasuries
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Permanent FRTB reforms seen as vital for IMA adoption
Temporary relief granted in June has done little to encourage internal model use in Europe
How to ensure the next Credit Suisse or SVB fails ‘well’
Regulators are planning changes to resolution rules after criticism that living wills were ignored in previous bank collapses
Asian firms waiting on exemptions from UST clearing mandate
Hoping for relief on extraterritoriality, 51% of Apac firms have yet to start compliance programmes
Already under FRTB, some banks hope for modelling reprieve
Risk Live: BMO and UBS opted for SA, but believe regulators could still opt to follow softer US rules
Regulators better prepared for next Credit Suisse, says SRB head
FSB strengthening guidance on international co-operation, but EU needs more mutual support
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish