IMF issues credit derivatives warning
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) believes the lack of financial disclosure and transparency in the credit derivatives market has the potential to increase market risk, as participants find it more difficult to gauge the depth of credit deterioration caused by credit events.
The study quoted figures taken from the Bank of England’s 2001 Financial Stability Review and the 1999/2000 British Bankers Association’s credit derivatives survey. These reports showed that insurance companies, hedge funds and corporates make up 36% of the total protection sellers' market.
Garry Schinasi, the IMF's financial markets stability division chief, and one of the authors of the report, told RiskNews: “There is a new set of sellers of protection that haven’t managed a lot of credit risk [before]. It is possible that they could be mispricing it.”
Schinasi added that this could lead to a greater amount of credit risk being transferred to investors that ultimately lie at the end of the credit chain.
The IMF report also said the leveraged characteristic of most credit derivatives could deepen the effects of credit events. But the IMF acknowledged that the credit derivatives market does have its benefits in controlling credit risk, and has stood up well to the Enron and Argentinian crises.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Bank of Communications moves early to meet TLAC requirements
China Construction Bank becomes last China G-Sib to release TLAC plans
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
- Filling gaps in market data with optimal transport