Agencies aim to unite US with Basel liquidity risk standards
US regulatory authorities yesterday released proposed guidance on contingent funding and liquidity risk in a bid to bring US financial institutions into alignment with international liquidity standards.
In a consultation paper released jointly by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of Thrift Supervision and the National Credit Union Administration, the US agencies re-emphasised "the importance of cashflow projections, diversified funding sources and a well-developed contingency funding plan" as primary tools for measuring and managing liquidity risk.
Formally titled Interagency guidance on funding and liquidity management, the consultation brings US principles into line with the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's recently released Principles for sound liquidity risk management and supervision.
Although the new document mainly covers old ground, it also provides more detail on some proposals - the active management of intraday liquidity and collateral, the maintenance of adequate levels of highly liquid marketable securities free of legal or regulatory impairments that can be used to meet liquidity needs in stressful situations, and the establishment of comprehensive contingency funding plans.
Supervisors will then "assess these critical elements in their reviews of an institution's liquidity risk management process in relation to its size, complexity and scope of operations".
Institutions will also be required to stress test regularly for a variety of firm-specific and market-wide events across multiple time horizons to identify sources of liquidity strain, and should be able to calculate all of their collateral positions on an intraday and overnight basis.
While many of the statutes are similar to existing US liquidity risk mandates, the guidance seeks to better marry current funding measures with those thrashed out by the Basel Committee in response to the lessons of the financial crisis.
When finalised, the guidance will apply to all US domestic financial institutions, including banks, thrifts and credit unions. Comments must be submitted to firms' respective regulators within 60 days.
See also: US regulatory reforms will target the big players
Risk Europe: Regulators must address structural liquidity mismatches
Reporting riddle
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry pushes EU exchanges to solve equity post-trade frictions
Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan join calls for mandatory cash CCP interoperability
Regulatory clarity urged for CME’s single-stock futures
SEC short selling and market access rules may hamper clearing and broker participation
Imminent US shake-up of LCR slated to include discount window
Adding Fed liquidity facility to bank regulation may help overcome stigma, raise lending capacity
French regulator wants permanent changes to EU’s output floor
Push for capital relief faces resistance from supervisors in Finland and the Netherlands
Council plans take Aquis, BME out of Esma oversight
German push to exempt Deutsche Börse catches three others, according to sources
Why watering down resolution plans is a bad idea
Bank failures are inevitable; banking crises are not
BIS’s Hernández de Cos on AI, non-bank risk and tokenisation
General manager talks about how the BIS is navigating a complex global environment
‘European SEC’ no silver bullet for growth
EU policymakers hope a single, centralised supervisor will help rev up Europe’s economy but critics are mustering