Morgan Stanley fined over $120m mismark
The UK Financial Services Authority has fined Morgan Stanley £1.4 million for failing to supervise one of its prop traders, allowing him to mismark a portfolio of illiquid credit products by $120 million last year.
The bank discovered in May 2008 that Matthew Piper, a credit trader on the bank's prop trading team, had failed to mark down his portfolio of credit derivatives, reportedly options on the Markit CDX credit index, as rising volatility and falling liquidity affected their value.
Piper was the bank's only market-maker in these products, and his books were not independently supervised, the FSA said, adding there was no clear line of supervision. In addition, a stress test introduced in November 2007 to make up for the lack of other valuation "was inadequate, wrongly applied and inaccurately described". The bank also failed to pay attention to complaints by counterparties that products were being wrongly valued.
Morgan Stanley benefitted from paying the fine early - it would otherwise have been £2 million, the FSA said. Piper was also fined £105,000 and banned from regulated financial activity for "deliberate misconduct", including mismarking and attempting to conceal the mismarks. The mismarking existed "for approximately five months", the FSA said.
See also: Morgan Stanley trader mis-marking for months
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Burning ambition: will Europe join the US in setting fire to the rules?
As the US dismantles post-crisis regulations, some think Europe will follow in a bid to boost economic growth
Can US perpetual futures solve their identity crisis?
Market could fall under four different regulatory categories, with sharply diverging outcomes
Banks want AML data upgrade to complement US regulatory reform
FinCEN’s proposed overhaul sparks debate on whether it will lead to smarter or weaker supervision
Industry pushes EU exchanges to solve equity post-trade frictions
Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan join calls for mandatory cash CCP interoperability
Regulatory clarity urged for CME’s single-stock futures
SEC short selling and market access rules may hamper clearing and broker participation
Imminent US shake-up of LCR slated to include discount window
Adding Fed liquidity facility to bank regulation may help overcome stigma, raise lending capacity
French regulator wants permanent changes to EU’s output floor
Push for capital relief faces resistance from supervisors in Finland and the Netherlands
Council plans take Aquis, BME out of Esma oversight
German push to exempt Deutsche Börse catches three others, according to sources