Merrill Lynch suspends equity derivatives trader
Merrill Lynch has initiated a probe into suspicious activity detected on one of its equity derivatives trading desks, suspending one of the traders at the desk.
The unnamed trader, who worked at a proprietary trading desk in London, is being investigated on suspicion of inflating mark prices on some of the single stock derivatives he traded.
Confirming the matter in an emailed statement, Jezz Farr, a London-based spokesman for the bank, said: “Our preliminary review determined that one desk used marks that appear to be outside of our accepted policy. We have suspended a trader and we continue to review this matter.”
The irregular valuations, which are said to have taken place in April, were flagged by the bank’s risk management system that routinely reviews the marks set by the traders. “This case shows our oversight system works,” said Farr.
This activity brings the bank's risk management system under further scrutiny, as it battles to regain shareholder confidence after racking up losses of about $37 billion in subprime debt-related asset writedowns and credit losses.
Merrill Lynch now joins the ranks of Credit Suisse and Société Générale, which have also been battling problems of rogue trader activity.
Credit Suisse on February 19 revealed a $2.85 billion writedown due to trader mis-markings and pricing errors in structured credit products, just a month after Société Générale stunned the financial markets with a €4.9 billion trading loss due to rogue activity by one of its traders.
See also : €4.9 billion fraud at Société Générale
Credit Suisse reveals $2.85bn subprime credit writedown
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Bank of Communications moves early to meet TLAC requirements
China Construction Bank becomes last China G-Sib to release TLAC plans
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Top 10 op risks: third parties stoke cyber risk
- Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites