New regulation proposed for OTC energy derivatives
A bill was introduced in the US Senate yesterday that seeks to expand regulatory oversight of the over-the-counter energy commodity derivatives market. Bill sponsor Senator Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat from California, wants the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to provide greater transparency for energy commodity derivatives transactions on multilateral markets and electronic trading platforms.
Bill co-sponsors Senator Maria Cantwell, Democrat from Washington, and Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat from Oregon, along with Feinstein, represent western US states that were plagued in 2000 and 2001 by soaring energy prices.
Some have charged that the high prices were due to market manipulation by energy marketing firms such as Enron. As a possible example of such manipulation, Feinstein said that on December 12, 2000, the spot price of natural gas in Southern California was $59 but only $10 in neighbouring San Juan and New Mexico. She claimed the cost of transporting natural gas between the two states at the time was only $1. “So there was $48 unaccounted for that undoubtedly found its way into someone’s pocket,” said Feinstein.
With the proposed new legislation, Feinstein added, the federal government would have new powers to “step in and do their jobs when markets have gone awry”.
In addition to expanding regulatory oversight of energy commodity derivatives, the bill would also require online trading forums to maintain sufficient capital to support their trading operations and to maintain open books and records for inspection by Federal authorities.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint