New regulation proposed for OTC energy derivatives
A bill was introduced in the US Senate yesterday that seeks to expand regulatory oversight of the over-the-counter energy commodity derivatives market. Bill sponsor Senator Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat from California, wants the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to provide greater transparency for energy commodity derivatives transactions on multilateral markets and electronic trading platforms.
Bill co-sponsors Senator Maria Cantwell, Democrat from Washington, and Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat from Oregon, along with Feinstein, represent western US states that were plagued in 2000 and 2001 by soaring energy prices.
Some have charged that the high prices were due to market manipulation by energy marketing firms such as Enron. As a possible example of such manipulation, Feinstein said that on December 12, 2000, the spot price of natural gas in Southern California was $59 but only $10 in neighbouring San Juan and New Mexico. She claimed the cost of transporting natural gas between the two states at the time was only $1. “So there was $48 unaccounted for that undoubtedly found its way into someone’s pocket,” said Feinstein.
With the proposed new legislation, Feinstein added, the federal government would have new powers to “step in and do their jobs when markets have gone awry”.
In addition to expanding regulatory oversight of energy commodity derivatives, the bill would also require online trading forums to maintain sufficient capital to support their trading operations and to maintain open books and records for inspection by Federal authorities.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management