New regulation proposed for OTC energy derivatives
A bill was introduced in the US Senate yesterday that seeks to expand regulatory oversight of the over-the-counter energy commodity derivatives market. Bill sponsor Senator Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat from California, wants the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to provide greater transparency for energy commodity derivatives transactions on multilateral markets and electronic trading platforms.
Bill co-sponsors Senator Maria Cantwell, Democrat from Washington, and Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat from Oregon, along with Feinstein, represent western US states that were plagued in 2000 and 2001 by soaring energy prices.
Some have charged that the high prices were due to market manipulation by energy marketing firms such as Enron. As a possible example of such manipulation, Feinstein said that on December 12, 2000, the spot price of natural gas in Southern California was $59 but only $10 in neighbouring San Juan and New Mexico. She claimed the cost of transporting natural gas between the two states at the time was only $1. “So there was $48 unaccounted for that undoubtedly found its way into someone’s pocket,” said Feinstein.
With the proposed new legislation, Feinstein added, the federal government would have new powers to “step in and do their jobs when markets have gone awry”.
In addition to expanding regulatory oversight of energy commodity derivatives, the bill would also require online trading forums to maintain sufficient capital to support their trading operations and to maintain open books and records for inspection by Federal authorities.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards