UK investor fears seem overdone, regulator says
It is right that regulators look hard at the UK’s regulatory regime to see whether improvements are needed to prevent a fraudulent attempt to inflate corporate earnings for personal gain, the UK’s chief financial regulator said today.
Davies said many investors have been shocked by a series of unpalatable revelations from US companies, in particular.
“Some of the previous comfortable certainties about corporate earnings and the integrity of company accounts have been thrown into question,” Davies said.
The UK cannot afford to be complacent - the prudent assumption must be that similar frauds could happen in Britain, he said.
That is despite UK accounting standards differing from those in the US, with UK accounting approaches often preferable to US ones. There is also a greater degree of independence built into the UK accounting and auditing regime, Davies said. But he added that a paper on options for auditing reform in the UK, to which the FSA is contributing, will be published shortly by the UK Treasury and the Trade and Industry Department.
“But while ‘it’ could happen here, so far it hasn’t,” Davies said. “We do appear to be buffeted by winds from across the Atlantic, rather than by any domestically generated bad weather,” he added
Davies said it was “slightly odd” that the fall in the FTSE 100 index of UK share prices was greater than that of the US Dow Jones index. The Dow has fallen by only 27% from its peak, compared with 40% for the FTSE, he noted.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Why Brexit still stirs up trouble for cross-border business
As EU erects another obstacle, banks consider ways around it – or exit strategies
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks