UK investor fears seem overdone, regulator says
It is right that regulators look hard at the UK’s regulatory regime to see whether improvements are needed to prevent a fraudulent attempt to inflate corporate earnings for personal gain, the UK’s chief financial regulator said today.
Davies said many investors have been shocked by a series of unpalatable revelations from US companies, in particular.
“Some of the previous comfortable certainties about corporate earnings and the integrity of company accounts have been thrown into question,” Davies said.
The UK cannot afford to be complacent - the prudent assumption must be that similar frauds could happen in Britain, he said.
That is despite UK accounting standards differing from those in the US, with UK accounting approaches often preferable to US ones. There is also a greater degree of independence built into the UK accounting and auditing regime, Davies said. But he added that a paper on options for auditing reform in the UK, to which the FSA is contributing, will be published shortly by the UK Treasury and the Trade and Industry Department.
“But while ‘it’ could happen here, so far it hasn’t,” Davies said. “We do appear to be buffeted by winds from across the Atlantic, rather than by any domestically generated bad weather,” he added
Davies said it was “slightly odd” that the fall in the FTSE 100 index of UK share prices was greater than that of the US Dow Jones index. The Dow has fallen by only 27% from its peak, compared with 40% for the FTSE, he noted.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos