
Nationalisation required for Japanese bank recovery, says Fitch
In January, Mizuho said it expected to post a net loss of around ¥2 trillion in the year to March – making it the largest loss in Japanese corporate history - after drastically increasing the level of bad debt it has written off over the year. The bank added that it expected to raise ¥1 trillion, probably through the issuance of preferred shares, to bolster its capital. Meanwhile, US investment banks Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch said they would invest in SMFG and UFJ respectively, as the Japanese institutions look for new ways to shore up capital reserves ahead of the fiscal year end.
But with special inspections by the country’s regulator, the Financial Services Agency (FSA), expected in the next few months, banks could be forced to raise their loan loss provisions further. The FSA plans to use a stricter discount cashflow methodology, which assesses a borrower’s ability to generate profits when categorising loan quality. The FSA may also restrict the use of deferred tax credits – essentially tax refunds on the cost of writing off bad loans - widely used by banks to shore up capital levels. This means that banks may still require substantial injections of additional capital, Fitch said.
“Somewhat ironically, the most likely event that would raise [banks’] long-term debt and individual ratings would be full-fledged nationalisation,” said the report. The FSA is currently setting guidelines for the conversion of government-owned preference shares into ordinary shares – a move that would make the government the major shareholder in the big banks. “On the other hand, the banks are making every effort to avoid this alternative,” the report added.
Fitch last week downgraded the long-term ratings of Mizuho, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation and UFJ to BBB+ from A-, maintaining a negative outlook on all three banks.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
SVB opens floodgates on liquidity buffers debate
European regulator says HQLAs should be booked at fair value, but not everyone agrees
SEC cyber rules risk creating web of confusion and costs
Proposals would require breach notifications, public disclosures and annual cyber assessments
Indonesia readies close-out netting after passing P2SK Law
Bankruptcy law changes remove close-out netting obstacles
Top 10 operational risks: The umpire strikes back
Tougher regulatory enforcement, new consumer rules and rise of ESG are ringing alarm bells
Behnam comments fan JSCC hopes for US client clearing
Japan clearing exec welcomes CFTC chair’s pledge to keep discussing OTC clearing status for non-US houses
SVB wouldn’t happen in Europe, says Deutsche CIB head
Campelli also thinks Credit Suisse’s bailed-in AT1 bonds acted as originally intended
How Finma milked Credit Suisse’s CoCos to close UBS deal
An unusual clause in Swiss AT1 bonds allowed them to be written off, but could others follow suit?