‘Witch hunt’ by regulators hits energy investor confidence
Current investigations by regulators into as many as 150 energy companies after the crises of California and Enron, amount to a ‘witch hunt’, according to a senior executive at Dynegy.
Speaking at sister publication Energy & Power Risk Management’s annual North American congress in Houston today, Cliff Hare, president of energy trading at Dynegy, said: “We see the current situation as a witch hunt in light of the Enron collapse. It’s an unfortunate word but that’s the way it looks.”
Hare added that the way Dynegy could reinvigorate investor confidence is to co-operate with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the SEC. “This is a strong and important industry,” he said. “It is prudent that allegations of wrongdoing are investigated and correct that answers are found, but this should not interfere with Dynegy and the rest of the energy industry doing the business we are here to do.”
On May 10, both Dynegy and Michigan-based energy company CMS Energy agreed to co-operate with SEC inquiries into the suspected act of buying and selling power simultaneously with each other to inflate trading volumes.
The SEC’s investigation into Dynegy’s allegedly volume-inflating trading practices has also proved cause for investor concern, but is not the only example in the market. Houston-based Reliant Energy admitted to the market on the same day that it too had bought and sold power simultaneously with an unnamed partner. The company, already under Ferc investigation for possibly illegal trading practices during the California power drought of 2000/1, has also seen its share price tumble. Reliant Energy shares were down $3.86 to $17.59 on Monday May 13 – a fall of 18%.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting
CFTC accused of ‘double standards’ on compute futures
Duffy questions ‘long review’ of CME’s contract when Kalshi already offers similar product
Europe’s banks can’t agree on how to fix the output floor
Some want market risk excluded, while others push for greater savings from credit modelling
SEC gunning to take over Cat in 2027
Regulator's bid for control of market surveillance apparatus splits industry participants
FCMs back CFTC proposal granting opt-out from CME oversight
New rules aim to address conflicts of interests at vertically integrated exchange groups