Report criticises Basel II
A new CSFI report sets out why the insurance industry is failing to gain an advantage from the new capital rules
LONDON - A new report from the Centre for the Study of Financial Innovation (CSFI), A tough nut… Basel II, insurance and the law of unexpected consequences, explains why insurers have so far had little joy from Basel II, which is supposed to provide a new role for insurance as a mitigator of operational risk.
Author Shirley Beglinger explains that, because Basel II was “written by bankers, primarily for bankers”, demands on insurers are expressed in a way that the insurance industry would be hard-pressed, or unable, to meet. Beglinger, who has worked both for the banking and the insurance industries, says that linguistic differences between the two make the problem of complying with Basel II exasperating for both sectors. She has worked with Swiss Re to gain Basel II recognition for insurance as a mitigator of operational risk.
As the deadline for Basel II approaches, Beglinger claims that insurers are handicapped in their role of mitigating operational risk, even for banks operating the internal ratings based and advanced measurement approaches. To facilitate the insurers’ task, she recommends that the confidence interval for calculating operational risk regulatory capital be reduced; insurance products be given the same generosity as credit derivatives in risk mitigation; and that the market of eligible banks for insurance risk mitigation be broadened.
Beglinger also proposes a complete rewrite of Basel II insurance rules to better cater for the buying and selling of insurance products. As the world is going ahead with Basel II – US exceptions aside – she recognises that scope for a full eleventh hour rewrite is at best optimistic. Initial industry responses suggest that the industry will struggle to amend existing policies, and that changes in the insurance industry will inevitably complement Basel’s evolution. The value of Beglinger’s paper is perhaps more as a warning – highlighting increasingly unavoidable conflicts between the banking and insurance industries.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting
CFTC accused of ‘double standards’ on compute futures
Duffy questions ‘long review’ of CME’s contract when Kalshi already offers similar product
Europe’s banks can’t agree on how to fix the output floor
Some want market risk excluded, while others push for greater savings from credit modelling
SEC gunning to take over Cat in 2027
Regulator's bid for control of market surveillance apparatus splits industry participants