SEC freezes assets of $72 Million WEB FRAUD operation
WASHINGTON, DC - The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has obtained an emergency court order to freeze assets from an alleged internet fraud operation that had defrauded $72 million from around 3,000 investors in the US and at least 30 other countries. The SEC says it launched its action with the assistance of Michigan's Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation, the US Secret Service, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
The court order alleges that Gregory McKnight and his firm Legisi Holdings sold unregistered securities between December 2005 and November 2007 through a website claiming to invest proceeds in commodity futures, stocks, shares, real estate and the foreign exchange market. The website promised to pay monthly interest of 15%. The SEC says McKnight invested only $33 million - less than half of the money raised - with resulting losses for investors. A further $30 million was dissipated through an illegal Ponzi scheme and $2.2 million alone spent by McKnight on personal expenditures and payments to relatives. A number of members of the defendant's family are also facing charges. The remaining assets have now been frozen under SEC control.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities
NBFI oversight ‘no longer adequate’, say BdF economists
Researchers call for stronger supervision of non-bank sector ‘before risks actually materialise’
Why Brexit still stirs up trouble for cross-border business
As EU erects another obstacle, banks consider ways around it – or exit strategies
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor