
SEC freezes assets of $72 Million WEB FRAUD operation
LOSSES & LAWSUITS
WASHINGTON, DC - The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has obtained an emergency court order to freeze assets from an alleged internet fraud operation that had defrauded $72 million from around 3,000 investors in the US and at least 30 other countries. The SEC says it launched its action with the assistance of Michigan's Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation, the US Secret Service, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
The court order alleges that Gregory McKnight and his firm Legisi Holdings sold unregistered securities between December 2005 and November 2007 through a website claiming to invest proceeds in commodity futures, stocks, shares, real estate and the foreign exchange market. The website promised to pay monthly interest of 15%. The SEC says McKnight invested only $33 million - less than half of the money raised - with resulting losses for investors. A further $30 million was dissipated through an illegal Ponzi scheme and $2.2 million alone spent by McKnight on personal expenditures and payments to relatives. A number of members of the defendant's family are also facing charges. The remaining assets have now been frozen under SEC control.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether
The Fed’s stress test models are inaccurate. Something has to change
First step for US regulator to improve its bank loss forecasts would be to open up its models to public scrutiny, argue two banking industry advocates
Bankers call for overhaul of EBA stress tests
Support for multiple scenarios, but only if fixed assumptions and variables are scaled back
CFTC plan to relax MMF margin restriction sparks debate
Industry welcomes proposal to lift ban on repo-using funds as eligible IM, but some warn MMFs bring risks
Legal challenges loom for renewed US focus on Sifis
Lawyers say any FSOC attempt to designate systemic non-banks risks a repeat of MetLife case