FSA chairman gets tough on liquidity issues
Chairman McCarthy defends tripartite system and promises action on liquidity regardless of Basel Committee delays
LONDON – Callum McCarthy, chairman of the UK Financial Services Authority, gave a determined speech to delegates at the annual British Bankers’ Association conference yesterday, confirming the benefits of the regulator’s role as the single supervisor of all financial institutions irrespective of their business type, alongside vigorously defending the use of principles-based regulation. McCarthy also stated that tougher liquidity rules for financial institutions were badly needed, sooner rather than later, and promised to plough ahead with plans to reform the rules even if the Basel Committee continued to delay in setting out an international response to the credit crisis.
“I know international banks would like to manage their liquidity globally, subject to one global, not several national, set of rules,” said McCarthy. “But, unless there is a step change in the speed with which the Basel Committee progresses international agreement, regulators will be forced to deal with this on a national level. That is what we plan to do in the UK. I am of course very keen that the Basel Committee should actively consider whether it can develop a resilient approach to the cross-border management of liquidity for banking groups, which meets the most compelling requirements of regulators and industry alike. But we cannot delay.”
The collapse of Northern Rock in the UK, coupled with the intense media attention, has made it even more vital for the FSA to be seen to be acting on reforming the liquidity regime, which has been shown to be wholly inadequate to deal with the current market situation. In December the UK tripartite authorities – the FSA, Bank of England and Treasury – set out for consultation a series of measures designed to improve the UK's liquidity regime. Initial feedback suggests respondents broadly agreed with the policy objectives set out in the paper. There was strong agreement on the importance of the close relationship between the central bank’s role, actions and provisions, and firms’ internal liquidity risk management processes, as well as any measures developed by the FSA under a new regulatory regime. Respondents also agreed that quantitative requirements were a necessary component of any liquidity regime, particularly for the short term, and thought one single quantitative regime should replace the existing three.
The FSA will consult further on all aspects of the new regime later this year, including setting out proposals on sound practices for managing liquidity risk with a strong focus on stress-testing. These enhanced qualitative requirements are intended to reflect the work being carried out by the Basel Committee and form the centrepiece of the new liquidity policy – the Committee is due to submit a set of high-level principles within the next few weeks.
McCarthy also set out how the new resolution framework, due to be introduced in October, will work in practice. The critical elements of the proposal include the explicit legal recognition of the Bank of England’s core responsibility for financial stability and changes to the oversight of this responsibility by the Court; a range of measures designed to improve the supervision of financial institutions, to make failures less likely; the introduction of a resolution regime to deal with failing banks; changes to the compensation scheme, to make it easier and faster to pay off depositors in the event of failure; and measures to build on and improve the co-ordination of the Tripartite Authorities.
The FSA chairman also confirmed that the supervisor will be paying more attention to how a firm’s incentives structure is arranged: “I think it entirely appropriate for supervisors, as part of our general assessment of systems and controls, to be interested in compensation and incentive structures, and – just as we take other aspects of a bank’s control philosophy and practice into account – to adjust our assessment of prudential requirements, including capital, for a bank accordingly,” he said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Bank of Communications moves early to meet TLAC requirements
China Construction Bank becomes last China G-Sib to release TLAC plans
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Top 10 op risks: third parties stoke cyber risk
- Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites