Cebs issues guidelines for revised large exposures regime
CP26 on large exposures issued by Cebs for the amended Capital Requirements Directive
LONDON - The Committee of European Banking Supervisors (Cebs) has released a consultation paper of implementation guidelines for the revised large exposures regime, which will form part of the updated Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
The draft guidelines focus on three aspects of the revised regime. The first is the definition of 'connected clients' and particularly the concept of 'interconnectedness'.
The second and third aspects are calculation of exposure values for schemes with exposure to underlying assets, and reporting requirements - particularly their linkage with the Common Reporting (Corep) framework for a harmonised European reporting system.
The draft guidelines set out in CP26 build on Cebs' earlier advice to the European Commission. In elaborating this document, Cebs has benefited from input provided by industry experts nominated by members and observers of Cebs' Consultative Panel.
A revised large-exposures regime was included in the amended CRD following Cebs' second issue of advice delivered to the Commission in April 2008. The amended CRD provisions are due for transposition into European Union member state legislation by October 31, 2010, and will be applied from December 31, 2010.
Cebs says CP26 is open to all interested parties, including supervised institutions and other market participants, until September 11. It can be read here.
Cebs has also announced that on July 9 it will hold a public hearing on its April 15 consultation paper (CP25) on operational risk mitigation techniques. Click here to register.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities
CCPs trade blows over EU’s new open access push
Cboe Clear wants more interoperability; Euronext says ‘not with us’