Senate passes $700 billion Wall Street deal
One house of the US Congress has now approved the Treasury’s deal, but it could still fail
WASHINGTON, DC – The US Senate has passed a revised version of the Treasury’s $700 billion (£380 billion) bail-out plan. Both political parties in the upper house of Congress strongly supported the deal in a vote last night that President George W Bush said was “essential to the financial security of every American”.
To placate opponents of the plan, the redrawn proposal now includes $110 billion in tax breaks – with an emphasis on small businesses, and an increase in depositor protection from $100,000 to $250,000.
Senate leaders and both presidential candidates (who suspended electioneering for the vote) conspicuously avoided describing Treasury secretary Henry Paulson’s plan as a bail-out for Wall Street banks.
Whether the bill will pass through the House of Representatives after its narrow rejection on Monday depends on Republican whips’ ability to coerce rebels into backing the bill, which is widely seen as un-American and impolitic due to its unpopularity with anti-Wall Street blue-collar workers whose houses are in danger of repossession.
The bill is also unpopular among Democrats. Despite their having voted largely in favour of the bill at its last reading, it is uncertain how many more will be swayed by this revised offering. Many voted out similar tax cuts earlier this year, citing government failure to balance its books.
The House of Representatives will vote again on Friday.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Who is Selig? CFTC pick is smart and social, but some say too green
Colleagues praise crypto smarts and collegial style, but views on prediction markets and funding trouble Senate
EU single portal faces battle to unify cyber incident reporting
Digital omnibus package accused of lacking ambition to truly streamline notification requirements
Basel Committee members ‘buying time’ before fixing FRTB mess
Despite inconsistencies today, regulators maintain they want to align global regime eventually
How Basel III endgame will reshape banks’ business mix
B3E will affect portfolio focus and client strategy, says capital risk strategist
Derivatives industry blasts EU reporting framework
Complaints about duplicate and ambiguous trade reporting requirements aired at Esma’s Data Day
Why source code access is critical to Dora compliance
As Dora takes hold in EU, access to source code is increasingly essential, says Adaptive’s Kevin Covington
CVA capital charges – the gorilla in the mist
The behaviour of CVA risk weights at US banks in 2020 hints at the impact of the Basel III endgame
EU’s FRTB multiplier risks picking winners and losers
Attempts to find capital-neutral way to implement new rules might create unlevel playing field