RBS cuts 30,000 jobs; trims business; faces class-action suits
NEW YORK - Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) is expected to announce cuts of up to 30,000 jobs - 10% of the bank's global workforce - after sustaining a record £28 billion in losses for 2008. The 68% government-owned bank will withdraw from around 30 of its current 60 operating countries, including Malaysia and eastern Europe. In January the bank announced the sale of its 4.3% stake in Bank of China. It followed this by announcing 2,300 job cuts and an attempt to sell its remaining Asia-Pacific holdings. It is now understood that the job cuts will far exceed initial expectations due to a £1 billion restructuring of operations. Chief executive Stephen Hester is to create a subsidiary to offload £300 billion of unwanted assets - mostly in US lending, and Asian and Australian investments - to better value the company's core business.
RBS faces two class actions in the US. The most recent lawsuit is for $200 million and emerged on February 17 after the bank admitted hackers had breached its security systems in November 2008, withdrawing $9 million from 100 automatic teller machines in 49 cities within half an hour. RBS Worldpay, the bank's payment processing arm, said the social security numbers of 1.1 million Americans could have been accessed by the breach. RBS has taken responsibility for the losses incurred by the scam and says it will fight the suit on the grounds that none of its customers incurred losses.
The bank was already facing a class action from January 27 accusing it and its directors of misleading investors regarding its shares during the credit crisis. The suit claims the bank announced the sale of up to $10 billion in American depository shares (ADS) in June 2007 but failed to disclose the damage suffered by debt securities on its balance sheet. The filing also alleges RBS failed to disclose internal control failures, and the true cost of its acquisition of Dutch bank ABN Amro and resulting capitalisation issues. Shares in RBS rallied towards the end of February as a result of the bank's restructuring plan.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
‘European SEC’ no silver bullet for growth
EU policymakers hope a single, centralised supervisor will help rev up Europe’s economy but critics are mustering
Permanent FRTB reforms seen as vital for IMA adoption
Temporary relief granted in June has done little to encourage internal model use in Europe
How to ensure the next Credit Suisse or SVB fails ‘well’
Regulators are planning changes to resolution rules after criticism that living wills were ignored in previous bank collapses
Asian firms waiting on exemptions from UST clearing mandate
Hoping for relief on extraterritoriality, 51% of Apac firms have yet to start compliance programmes
Already under FRTB, some banks hope for modelling reprieve
Risk Live: BMO and UBS opted for SA, but believe regulators could still opt to follow softer US rules
Regulators better prepared for next Credit Suisse, says SRB head
FSB strengthening guidance on international co-operation, but EU needs more mutual support
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption