
FSA acts on disclosure of contracts for difference
Daily news headlines
LONDON – The UK Financial Services Authority has announced it will implement a general disclosure regime for long contracts for difference (CFD) positions – derivatives that allow for investors to speculate on share price movements.
Under the new regime, existing share and CFD holdings in the same company should be aggregated for disclosure purposes and the initial disclosure threshold will be maintained at 3%. This, the FSA says, is the most effective way of addressing concerns in relation to voting rights and corporate influence. The regulator is proposing an exemption for CFD writers, which act as intermediaries, to reduce unnecessary disclosures.
The FSA Feedback Statement, which responds to its consultation paper issued in November 2007, contains draft rules to implement the position but the FSA will accept technical comments on the rules to ensure they are effective. The deadline for comments is January 23, 2009 and the FSA aims to issue final rules in February 2009 that will come into effect on September 1, 2009.
Alexander Justham, FSA director of markets, said: “Our goal is to provide an effective and proportionate disclosure regime that works for all involved, and sustains market confidence and efficiency. We have received extensive support for the approach we are taking, since we announced it in July. We would like to thank all those who provided feedback."
Peter Green and Jeremy Jennings-Mares, capital markets partners at the law firm, Morrison & Foerster, commented:
“It is questionable how useful this information will be to companies. Arguably, this level of disclosure gives them more information than they need. It will be difficult to establish which disclosing parties are ‘pure’ economic investors and which are quasi shareholders, which means the intentions of the investing parties will not be known.
“At least at the outset, it is likely the information disclosed on holdings will be confusing and duplicative, as there is likely to be more than one disclosure in respect of the same major shareholding - one in respect of the share itself and at least one other in respect of a synthetic long position on that share. There could even be disclosure of CFD positions in aggregate in excess of 100% of the shares, since a CFD writer is not compelled to acquire the shares as a hedge.
“However, there is no doubt the rules provide more clarity at a time when the market is in most need of it. Other countries have yet to be as decisive on transparency and disclosure. Given the global nature of the capital and derivatives markets, a uniform approach to disclosure of these instruments is highly desirable. Time will tell if the SEC and other European authorities follow the FSA’s lead.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Europe’s lenders sail into uncharted waters of the banking book
Regulators are pushing banks to map their credit spread risk. Here be dragons?
SEC may lack legal clout to impose new dealer rule – Citadel
Adoption of quantitative dealer definition may require congressional changes to US Securities Exchange Act
US Basel endgame hits clearing with op risk capital charges
Dealers also fret about unlevel playing field compared with requirements in the EU
CFTC’s clearing house recovery rule splits industry
Some fear CCPs will fast-track recovery, others say any rule book will be ignored in emergency
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether