Santander settles over Madoff
NEW YORK - Spain's largest bank, Banco Santander, has agreed to settle claims related to investments in Bernard Madoff's scheme by two hedge funds operated by its Optimal Investment Services unit. The bank will pay $235 million in an out-of-court deal to the trustee liquidating Madoff's money-management firm.
The settlement was reached in an attempt to avoid a lawsuit by the trustee, Irving Picard, who has been suing Madoff's biggest investors. It is equal to 85% of Picard's claim against Santander.
"We hope that other entities against which we have claims will likewise come forward to settle those claims for the benefit of all of Madoff's victims," Picard said in a statement.
Santander said in a statement: "The funds' potential clawback liability did not imply any wrongdoing by the funds. The trustee concluded that their conduct does not provide grounds to assert any claim against the Optimal companies or any other entity of the Santander group, other than the clawback claims."
Picard has now collected $1.22billion to help repay Madoff's victims. He has also filed a clawback lawsuit against three Fairfield Greenwich Group hedge funds for the return of $3.54 billion withdrawn before Madoff's fraud unravelled. This joins several other suits filed by Picard that seek a total of $10.1 billion from investors he claims should have known of the fraud. the trustee is also seeking about $735 million from Madoff customers outside of court.
Madoff pleaded guilty to running a $65 billion ponzi scheme and will be sentenced in July.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous