Santander settles over Madoff
NEW YORK - Spain's largest bank, Banco Santander, has agreed to settle claims related to investments in Bernard Madoff's scheme by two hedge funds operated by its Optimal Investment Services unit. The bank will pay $235 million in an out-of-court deal to the trustee liquidating Madoff's money-management firm.
The settlement was reached in an attempt to avoid a lawsuit by the trustee, Irving Picard, who has been suing Madoff's biggest investors. It is equal to 85% of Picard's claim against Santander.
"We hope that other entities against which we have claims will likewise come forward to settle those claims for the benefit of all of Madoff's victims," Picard said in a statement.
Santander said in a statement: "The funds' potential clawback liability did not imply any wrongdoing by the funds. The trustee concluded that their conduct does not provide grounds to assert any claim against the Optimal companies or any other entity of the Santander group, other than the clawback claims."
Picard has now collected $1.22billion to help repay Madoff's victims. He has also filed a clawback lawsuit against three Fairfield Greenwich Group hedge funds for the return of $3.54 billion withdrawn before Madoff's fraud unravelled. This joins several other suits filed by Picard that seek a total of $10.1 billion from investors he claims should have known of the fraud. the trustee is also seeking about $735 million from Madoff customers outside of court.
Madoff pleaded guilty to running a $65 billion ponzi scheme and will be sentenced in July.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion