Santander settles over Madoff
NEW YORK - Spain's largest bank, Banco Santander, has agreed to settle claims related to investments in Bernard Madoff's scheme by two hedge funds operated by its Optimal Investment Services unit. The bank will pay $235 million in an out-of-court deal to the trustee liquidating Madoff's money-management firm.
The settlement was reached in an attempt to avoid a lawsuit by the trustee, Irving Picard, who has been suing Madoff's biggest investors. It is equal to 85% of Picard's claim against Santander.
"We hope that other entities against which we have claims will likewise come forward to settle those claims for the benefit of all of Madoff's victims," Picard said in a statement.
Santander said in a statement: "The funds' potential clawback liability did not imply any wrongdoing by the funds. The trustee concluded that their conduct does not provide grounds to assert any claim against the Optimal companies or any other entity of the Santander group, other than the clawback claims."
Picard has now collected $1.22billion to help repay Madoff's victims. He has also filed a clawback lawsuit against three Fairfield Greenwich Group hedge funds for the return of $3.54 billion withdrawn before Madoff's fraud unravelled. This joins several other suits filed by Picard that seek a total of $10.1 billion from investors he claims should have known of the fraud. the trustee is also seeking about $735 million from Madoff customers outside of court.
Madoff pleaded guilty to running a $65 billion ponzi scheme and will be sentenced in July.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Imminent US shake-up of LCR slated to include discount window
Adding Fed liquidity facility to bank regulation may help overcome stigma, raise lending capacity
French regulator wants permanent changes to EU’s output floor
Push for capital relief faces resistance from supervisors in Finland and the Netherlands
Council plans take Aquis, BME out of Esma oversight
German push to exempt Deutsche Börse catches three others, according to sources
Why watering down resolution plans is a bad idea
Bank failures are inevitable; banking crises are not
BIS’s Hernández de Cos on AI, non-bank risk and tokenisation
General manager talks about how the BIS is navigating a complex global environment
‘European SEC’ no silver bullet for growth
EU policymakers hope a single, centralised supervisor will help rev up Europe’s economy but critics are mustering
Permanent FRTB reforms seen as vital for IMA adoption
Temporary relief granted in June has done little to encourage internal model use in Europe
How to ensure the next Credit Suisse or SVB fails ‘well’
Regulators are planning changes to resolution rules after criticism that living wills were ignored in previous bank collapses