Aite outlines fraud management priorities for US banks
A new report by industry analyst Aite looks at anti-fraud strategies at US banks
BOSTON - As fraud increases with the recession, financial analyst Aite has published a report into the strategies and budgets US banks are expected to employ to combat fraud over the next three years.
The research expects all fraud types to become higher priorities. Automated clearinghouse frauds are expected to see the greatest rise, while frauds using customer ATM cash machines are expected to cause the most losses.
Enterprise-wide case management was listed as the most important priority when implementing fraud software, although only 39% of firms said they had such arrangements in place.
"The good news is that funding for addressing fraud management is seen as mission-critical by financial institutions, and is unlikely to be scaled back despite current economic pressures," says Nick Holland, a senior analyst at Aite and author of the report.
"Fraud management departments are centralising, investing in monitoring technology and continuing to place a strong emphasis on the human element as the most critical component in fraud mitigation," he says.
The 31-page survey interviewed fraud managers at 23 of the top 150 US financial institutions, asking about fraud priorities and the budgets in place to address them.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos