SEPA clarification welcomed
European Payments Council issues clarification of Sepa payment cards scheme
BRUSSELS – The European Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB) have welcomed further clarification from the European Payments Council (EPC), the association of banks and banking associations that is setting up the Single Euro Payments Area (Sepa).
In the document, published in question-and-answer format, the EPC clarifies key aspects of compliance with the Sepa Cards Framework (SCF) for payment card schemes and banks, as well as the conditions for geographical coverage of card schemes within the Sepa. It hopes this will facilitate the transition from the existing fragmented and monopolistic national payments markets towards a competitive, Sepa-wide, payment cards market.
The Sepa is a unique initiative of the European banking industry to move from 31 national payment systems towards an integrated euro payments area. Once Sepa is a reality, Europeans will be able to make payments and cash withdrawals in euros throughout the Sepa area as easily as in their home country.
One of the most pressing issues concerns the rules for migration of cards to Sepa. Unlike the comprehensive rulebooks for credit transfers and direct debits, the SCF does not outline any detailed rules and standards, but rather describes three options for attaining Sepa compliance. Market participants seemed to interpret these three options in a way that meant a card scheme is only SCF compliant if it covers all 31 states of the Sepa territory.
The European Commission and the ECB are satisfied by the EPC’s confirmation that – in the context of geographical coverage – compliance with the SCF only requires that cards be technically and commercially capable of being accepted everywhere in the Sepa territory. Therefore, any scheme, even an efficient national scheme, will be able to become SCF compliant, provided that – among other requirements – it is technically and commercially capable of admitting banks from other Sepa countries.
Click here to access the paper
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion
Iosco chief sees no need for CCPs to hold more capital
CCPs have shown resilience in volatile times without extra skin-in-the-game, says Buenaventura
Banks urge EBA to delay risk benchmarking amid Iran conflict
Risk managers say hypothetical portfolio exercise clashes with severe market turbulence
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms