SEPA clarification welcomed
European Payments Council issues clarification of Sepa payment cards scheme
BRUSSELS – The European Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB) have welcomed further clarification from the European Payments Council (EPC), the association of banks and banking associations that is setting up the Single Euro Payments Area (Sepa).
In the document, published in question-and-answer format, the EPC clarifies key aspects of compliance with the Sepa Cards Framework (SCF) for payment card schemes and banks, as well as the conditions for geographical coverage of card schemes within the Sepa. It hopes this will facilitate the transition from the existing fragmented and monopolistic national payments markets towards a competitive, Sepa-wide, payment cards market.
The Sepa is a unique initiative of the European banking industry to move from 31 national payment systems towards an integrated euro payments area. Once Sepa is a reality, Europeans will be able to make payments and cash withdrawals in euros throughout the Sepa area as easily as in their home country.
One of the most pressing issues concerns the rules for migration of cards to Sepa. Unlike the comprehensive rulebooks for credit transfers and direct debits, the SCF does not outline any detailed rules and standards, but rather describes three options for attaining Sepa compliance. Market participants seemed to interpret these three options in a way that meant a card scheme is only SCF compliant if it covers all 31 states of the Sepa territory.
The European Commission and the ECB are satisfied by the EPC’s confirmation that – in the context of geographical coverage – compliance with the SCF only requires that cards be technically and commercially capable of being accepted everywhere in the Sepa territory. Therefore, any scheme, even an efficient national scheme, will be able to become SCF compliant, provided that – among other requirements – it is technically and commercially capable of admitting banks from other Sepa countries.
Click here to access the paper
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities
NBFI oversight ‘no longer adequate’, say BdF economists
Researchers call for stronger supervision of non-bank sector ‘before risks actually materialise’
Why Brexit still stirs up trouble for cross-border business
As EU erects another obstacle, banks consider ways around it – or exit strategies
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor