UK consults on Rome I Regulation
The UK ministry of Justice has issued a consultation paper on the UK’s decision to opt into EU contract law Rome I
LONDON – The UK Ministry of Justice has published a consultation paper (CP) that seeks views on whether the UK should opt in to the proposed Rome I Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) and, if so, whether the Rome I rules should apply throughout the UK. When the draft EU legislation first emerged in December 2005, UK business leaders were up in arms as they believed that Rome I threatened to seriously undermine the financial services sector and damage online businesses, and has the potential to become a legal compliance nightmare.
Rome I, which the European Commission claims simply enshrines into European law the policies set out in the 1980 Rome Convention, sets out the rules to determine the applicable laws of contract in cross-border trade. However, the draft legislation contained substantial amendments to the Rome Convention that could have serious and wide-ranging ramifications for cross-border trade.
Under the draft proposal, a UK firm selling its goods and services to consumers across the EU would no longer be secure in the knowledge that it is broadly governed by English law. Instead it would have to navigate a minefield of up to 27 different, often conflicting legal regimes – or, more likely, opt not to do business outside the UK.
Following consultation with UK stakeholders in 2006, the UK government decided to engage in the negotiations but not opt in to the proposal. The Council and the European Parliament agreed the text of Rome I in December 2007 and the CP states that Rome I will be formally adopted this year and its substantive provisions will come into force 18 months later.
The provisions in the original proposal that were of greatest concern to UK stakeholders during negotiations have either been removed, substantially revised or returned to their Rome Convention form subject to later review. In the case of those provisions subject to review, future amendments will not automatically bind the UK. In light of this, the UK government's preliminary conclusion is that the UK should now opt in to Rome I and apply similar rules to contracts connected to two or more jurisdictions within the UK. But the government wishes to test this conclusion by seeking views from stakeholders. The closing date for responses to the consultation paper is June 25, 2008. www.justice.gov.uk/docs/cp0508.pdf
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management