Bear Bankers on trial for collapse of Subprime Funds
NEW YORK - Two senior former Bear Stearns bankers have been arrested at their homes and have appeared in court, facing charges over the collapse of two of the failed bank's hedge funds. The funds folded with the loss of $6 billion (£3 billion) in July 2007 after their US subprime mortgage exposure became worthless.
Matthew Tannin, the bank's then asset manager, and Ralph Cioffi, who was directly responsible for the funds, are both accused of misleading investors and overstating the value of investments within the funds. They could be the first high-profile bankers prosecuted in relation to the subprime crisis.
Bear Stearns injected $1.6 billion of capital into the High Grade Strategy and Enhanced High Grade funds in June 2007, subsequently abandoning hope for their revival. Both men have reportedly told friends that they failed to realise the true state of the doomed investments within the funds, but were coping with the general downturn in debt markets. Cioffi moved $2 million of his own money out of one of the funds in March 2007.
The investigation is at the centre of a number by US regulator the Securities and Exchange Commission. Department of Justice (DoJ) investigators are reportedly currently gathering information and interviewing key witnesses. When that process is complete, the US Attorney for New York's eastern district, Benton Campbell, will assess whether securities laws have been broken and if so whether to press charges.
The DoJ began investigating the two funds since last summer, studying the facts connected to the closure of the funds, and around then Bear Stearns chairman James Cayne's decision to wind them down.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS