Bear Bankers on trial for collapse of Subprime Funds
NEW YORK - Two senior former Bear Stearns bankers have been arrested at their homes and have appeared in court, facing charges over the collapse of two of the failed bank's hedge funds. The funds folded with the loss of $6 billion (£3 billion) in July 2007 after their US subprime mortgage exposure became worthless.
Matthew Tannin, the bank's then asset manager, and Ralph Cioffi, who was directly responsible for the funds, are both accused of misleading investors and overstating the value of investments within the funds. They could be the first high-profile bankers prosecuted in relation to the subprime crisis.
Bear Stearns injected $1.6 billion of capital into the High Grade Strategy and Enhanced High Grade funds in June 2007, subsequently abandoning hope for their revival. Both men have reportedly told friends that they failed to realise the true state of the doomed investments within the funds, but were coping with the general downturn in debt markets. Cioffi moved $2 million of his own money out of one of the funds in March 2007.
The investigation is at the centre of a number by US regulator the Securities and Exchange Commission. Department of Justice (DoJ) investigators are reportedly currently gathering information and interviewing key witnesses. When that process is complete, the US Attorney for New York's eastern district, Benton Campbell, will assess whether securities laws have been broken and if so whether to press charges.
The DoJ began investigating the two funds since last summer, studying the facts connected to the closure of the funds, and around then Bear Stearns chairman James Cayne's decision to wind them down.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”