Hedge funds agree to more regulation of their industry
At a House committee hearing, hedge fund managers agree to more regulation of their industry
The hearing came as senator Charles Grassley, ranking member on the Finance Committee, announced he intends to reintroduce legislation to require hedge funds to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In 2004, the SEC did attempt to force hedge funds to register with them, make certain information public and allow the supervisor to review their books. The programme failed, however, following a federal court challenge by one fund that was not appealed by the SEC.
At the hearing, George Soros, chairman of Soros Fund Management, stated that the entire US regulatory framework needed to be "reconsidered" and hedge funds need to be regulated within that new framework.
The other hedge fund managers that testified were John Alfred Paulson, president of Paulson & Co, James Simons, president of Renaissance Technologies, Philip Falcone, senior managing partner of Harbinger Capital Partners, and Kenneth Griffin, chief executive and president of Citadel Investment Group.
The managers confirmed that they would now be willing to provide information to supervisors for the purpose of monitoring systemic risk. However, they would not support releasing information on their investment strategies.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Permanent FRTB reforms seen as vital for IMA adoption
Temporary relief granted in June has done little to encourage internal model use in Europe
How to ensure the next Credit Suisse or SVB fails ‘well’
Regulators are planning changes to resolution rules after criticism that living wills were ignored in previous bank collapses
Asian firms waiting on exemptions from UST clearing mandate
Hoping for relief on extraterritoriality, 51% of Apac firms have yet to start compliance programmes
Already under FRTB, some banks hope for modelling reprieve
Risk Live: BMO and UBS opted for SA, but believe regulators could still opt to follow softer US rules
Regulators better prepared for next Credit Suisse, says SRB head
FSB strengthening guidance on international co-operation, but EU needs more mutual support
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish