Review of CRD expected by September 2008
Amendments to the Capital Requirements Directive are expected to clarify rules concerning risk mitigants and outsourcing
BRUSSELS – The European Banking Committee is discussing plan to amend the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), albeit only in limited specific areas. Under Article 156 of the Directive, the European Commission is required to review and report on the scope of its application by January 2012. This latest review is part of that process.
Proposals for changes to the CRD will include: new rules to limit the risk stemming from large exposures, harmonisation of the definition of hybrid capital, capital requirements for default risk in the trading book, a definition of the significance of risk transfer, technical changes to the securitisation framework and a series of changes to ease the administrative burden.
As operational risk accounts for only around 4% of the CRD, any changes to op risk issues will be strictly targeted, therefore this review will not result in any large-scale amendments to the directive. That said, the areas targeted for change concern national discretions and late additions to directives such as outsourcing and other risk mitigants, which can be difficult to understand.
The Commission is hoping to adopt a proposal by October 2008.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack