Review of CRD expected by September 2008
Amendments to the Capital Requirements Directive are expected to clarify rules concerning risk mitigants and outsourcing
BRUSSELS – The European Banking Committee is discussing plan to amend the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), albeit only in limited specific areas. Under Article 156 of the Directive, the European Commission is required to review and report on the scope of its application by January 2012. This latest review is part of that process.
Proposals for changes to the CRD will include: new rules to limit the risk stemming from large exposures, harmonisation of the definition of hybrid capital, capital requirements for default risk in the trading book, a definition of the significance of risk transfer, technical changes to the securitisation framework and a series of changes to ease the administrative burden.
As operational risk accounts for only around 4% of the CRD, any changes to op risk issues will be strictly targeted, therefore this review will not result in any large-scale amendments to the directive. That said, the areas targeted for change concern national discretions and late additions to directives such as outsourcing and other risk mitigants, which can be difficult to understand.
The Commission is hoping to adopt a proposal by October 2008.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion