Retail banking compliance survey: a reality check
New report from research and advisory firm Aite Group says compliance demands rising
Some 82% of compliance directors surveyed said compliance demands will be higher in the next three years, according to a new report from research and advisory firm Aite Group.
The report is based on a survey of heads of retail banking compliance at 17 banks, including 16 of the top 150 banks ranked by assets and one community bank. It shows that compliance demands are rising and that, for most institutions, there is significant pressure on resources, with many now counting on technology to help them do more with less.
Compliance managers are thinking through resource allocations to ensure that the most important issues are addressed first. But meeting current regulatory standards is an exercise in near-constant course correction because state and federal laws are in a perpetual state of flux. Committing the right amount of technology to do the job without literally and figuratively breaking the bank proves difficult.
"Creating an effective compliance programme is a highly customised process - every bank needs to think through its unique blend of products, processes, customers, geographies and technology to determine where the major risks are, and how they should be addressed," says Eva Weber, analyst at Aite Group and author of this report. "But it is clear from this survey that firms are almost universally struggling with resource constraints and rising workloads."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities
NBFI oversight ‘no longer adequate’, say BdF economists
Researchers call for stronger supervision of non-bank sector ‘before risks actually materialise’
Why Brexit still stirs up trouble for cross-border business
As EU erects another obstacle, banks consider ways around it – or exit strategies
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor