FDIC approves Basel II
Capital floors will be kept until the agencies prove the new rules can work, says Bair
WASHINGTON, DC – All four US regulators have now approved the final rule implementing the advanced approaches of the Basel II capital accord, with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) adding its stamp to the rule yesterday.
The FDIC has been one the sharpest critics of the Basel accord and has lobbied hard to ensure the leverage ratio is kept in place. Sheila Bair, chairman of the FDIC and a long-time advocate of the leverage ratio, says: “We have agreed, by regulation, not to allow any bank to exit its transitional risk-based capital floors unless and until the agencies publish a study giving the new rules a clean bill of health, or unless identified defects are remedied. If any agency allows its banks to exit the floors in a way that departs from this consensus approach, the rule requires that agency to publish a report explaining its reasoning.”
Bair is also a proponent of ensuring smaller US bank are not unduly disadvantaged by the larger banks’ adoption of the advanced approaches. The agencies are continuing to work on a proposed rule that would provide a standardised approach for smaller and community banks.
“It is very important for smaller banks that want to implement the standardised approach to have enough lead time to do this on a timeline parallel to the advanced approach. It is also important to note that the NPR [Notice of Proposed Rulemaking] will include a question for comment about whether the large banks, which we are today requiring to use the advanced approach, should be able to use the standardised approach instead,” Bair says.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions