CEIOPS publishes paper on risk management
CEIOPS lays out its high-level principles and minimum qualitative requirements for risk management
The Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS) has published an issues paper entitled Risk Management and other Corporate Issues. As part of its preparation for future work under the Solvency II project, CEIOPS has developed high-level principles and minimum qualitative requirements, which could form the basis for a risk and governance structure of undertakings. Some of those principles are set out in this paper, which represents the direction of CEIOPS’ initial thinking on these issues.
The main focus of the paper is on the importance of having a robust system of governance in place with an adequate organisational structure that is proportionate to the nature and scale of the undertaking, and having annually-reviewed written policies in place on internal controls and risk management. However, it also says businesses should deal with a variety of risks including strategic risk, insurance-specific risk, market risk including asset-liability management, credit risk, concentration risk, liquidity risk, reputational risk and operational risk.
Although this is not a formal consultation paper, CEIOPS has invited comments by October 17. The purpose is to inform possible further work by CEIOPS in defining fundamental requirements for all undertakings, identifying potential options in light of forthcoming Level 2 implementing measures, and to inform any wider discussion (including on a Level 3 basis).
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities