FSA FINES NORWICH UNION LIFE £1.26M
LONDON - The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Norwich Union Life £1.26 million for exposing its customers' confidential information to fraud.
Several external fraud incidents took place, due to poor systems and controls at the firm, which resulted in a number of customers' names and dates of birth becoming publicly available. The fraudsters gained further confidential account access and information by impersonating customers in calls to the firm's call centres.
In all, 74 customers' policies - totalling £3.3 million - were surrendered to identity theft scams during 2006. The FSA said Norwich Union Life had failed its customers by not keeping their information secure and not properly assessing its fraud risk.
The company's own compliance department reported to superiors on the exposure after it had taken place, but nothing was at first done to rectify the problem. Norwich Union Life co-operated with the FSA investigation, conducting a review of information security processes and reinstating the policies in full.
Margaret Cole, FSA enforcement director, says: "This fine is a clear message that the FSA takes information security seriously and requires that firms do so too."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance