CEIOPS publishes advice on occupational pensions
CEIOPS has released its advice to Commissioner McCreevy on stakeholder issues in the European occupational pensions industry
FRANKFURT – The Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS) has published solvency proposals for the European occupational pensions sector, for debate on for discussion as part of the European Commission’s planned Solvency II regulation.
The advice paper, “Key issues on solvency for the European occupational pension sector”, was produced at the request of European internal market commissioner Charlie McCreevy, and is designed to identify issues for stakeholder consultation on prudential standards for the industry.
McCreevy, in a letter to CEIOPS dated May 14, said: “It would be particularly important to hear from shareholders whether they believe that, from an internal market perspective, a harmonised solvency regime for occupational pension funds covered by the directive on institutions for occupational retirement provision is desirable or not, and what the reasons are for expressing that view.”
The paper includes proposals for principles and targets for supervisory regimes for pension funds, the breadth of solvency rules for pension funds and cross-border activity, specific issues on the calculation of technical provisions, and security mechanisms and their interactions.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack
Bank of England softens tone on CCP cross-product margining
Breeden supports margin efficiencies to encourage more repo clearing, but still warns on leverage
UK securitisation reforms trump EU’s, say market players
Originators and investors could find UK securitised assets easier to deal with after tandem reviews