HKMA “strongly recommends” PEPs profiling
The HKMA industry working group’s guidance paper focuses on risks associated with politically exposed persons
HONG KONG – The Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing industry working group (IWG), chaired by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HMKA), has issued its first guidance paper on the subject of politically exposed persons (PEPs).
The paper highlights the risk that PEPs can misuse positions of power and influence for personal gain or to the advantage of family or associates, committing fraud, bribery and corruption, and spiriting funds away through foreign jurisdictions, under aliases and within various funds, private companies, trusts and foundations.
Institutions are recommended to mitigate this risk by carrying out specific profiling and recording of PEP customers and their transactions.
The IWG was established in June 2006, with representatives from 20 Hong Kong authorised institutions and the Joint Financial Intelligence Unit (JFIU), to strengthen the banking industry’s anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CFT) defences by developing industry standards and best practice.
The report was developed by an IWG sub-group, which looked into non-retail customer due diligence (CDD) processes. The IWG consists of three user sub-groups: general CDD; CDD processes for non-retail banking; and suspicious transaction monitoring and reporting.
The conclusions do not represent formal HKMA regulation, but rather strong recommendations. The HKMA is asking for “full consideration to the adoption of these practices” unless they do not apply or alternate measures for complying with the HKMA’s AML and CFT guidelines are already in place.
The HKMA says it will continue to study issues such as CDD processes for offshore companies and address proof for personal customers, with guidance papers where appropriate.
The IWG will also have a webpage on the HMKA site, with online access to guidance papers.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions