Korean Regulator suspends state street forex Business
SEOUL - South Korea's financial regulator has suspended the foreign exchange (FX) business of State Street's Seoul branch for a month, following the discovery of violations to forex regulations.
The Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) suspended the institutional asset manager's licence for FX trading from May 14 to June 13, which includes futures and FX swaps.
"This action was handed down because of the way we booked our internal non-deliverable forward (NDF) FX transactions between our Seoul and Hong Kong branches in the period from 2001-2005," said a Boston-based spokesperson at State Street. "At no time were any of our customers or market counterparties affected by State Street's decisions regarding these internal foreign exchange accounting methods, and in 2005 we adopted an alternative hedging methodology acceptable to the FSS."
The FSS is to strengthen the monitoring activities of the operational risk management of financial services firms, according to the Korea Development Bank.
The government-run policy bank said the FSS will map out measures to press banks and brokerages to control operational loopholes, and plans to conduct on-the-spot inspections on several bank branches.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”