FSA fines Charterhouse £122,500 for portfolio mismanagement
LONDON – Charterhouse Consulting Wealth Management Limited has been fined £122,500 by the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) for carrying out discretionary portfolio management without permission, and for various conduct of business failings.
Charterhouse regularly switched a number of clients between funds, although the firm did not have permission to operate in this way. The FSA investigation found that Charterhouse would often send clients an email before 6.30am proposing the switching of funds and requiring a response by 8.00am. Switches would then take place without any further instruction from the client.
Charterhouse also failed to record sufficient client information to demonstrate the suitability of its advice, failed to ensure transactions were appropriate for its customers' attitude to risk; and failed to communicate with its clients in a clear and fair manner that was not misleading.
In handing down the fine, the FSA took into account mitigating steps taken by Charterhouse to improve its business activities, including the cessation of business activities falling outside its permitted remit. As a result of agreeing to settle at the earliest opportunity, Charterhouse received the maximum 30% discount afforded under the FSA's Discount Scheme. The fine would otherwise have been £175,000.
"It is unacceptable for a firm to operate in effect as a discretionary portfolio manager without appropriate FSA authorisation. The switching of clients between funds in a way that was outside their declared attitude to risk could have resulted in their suffering large and unexpected financial losses," said Jonathan Phelan, head of retail enforcement at the FSA.
"The disciplinary action we have taken sends out the clear message that firms wishing to offer wealth management services must ensure they operate in a compliant way, which includes ensuring they have the appropriate regulatory permissions for their business activities," Phelan added.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
NBFI oversight ‘no longer adequate’, say BdF economists
Researchers call for stronger supervision of non-bank sector ‘before risks actually materialise’
Why Brexit still stirs up trouble for cross-border business
As EU erects another obstacle, banks consider ways around it – or exit strategies
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports