ABN Amro to pay regulators $80 million
WASHINGTON, DC – ABN Amro Bank has been charged $80 million in penalties for violations of anti-money laundering (ALM) laws, according to an announcement by the Federal Reserve System (Fed) in mid-December.
The agencies have assessed penalties based on findings of unsafe and unsound practices; on findings of systemic defects in ABN Amro's internal controls to ensure compliance with US AML laws, which resulted in failures to identify, analyse and report suspicious activity; and on findings that ABN Amro participated in transactions that violated US sanctions laws.
The Federal Reserve Board and OFAC have assessed a penalty of $40 million, payment of which will satisfy the penalty concurrently assessed by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of $30 million.
The New York State Banking Department has assessed a monetary payment of $20 million, the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation has assessed a penalty of $15 million, and ABN Amro will make an additional $5 million voluntary payment to the Illinois Bank Examiners' Education Foundation.
The order requires ABN Amro to improve its global compliance and risk management systems to ensure adequate oversight, effective risk management and full compliance with applicable US laws and regulations. It largely supersedes the July 23, 2004 agreement between ABN Amro, its New York branch, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, New York State Banking Department and the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say