UBS expects subprime losses of $680 million in third quarter
LONDON - Swiss lender UBS has suffered its first quarterly loss in a decade, leading to a purge of senior management positions and job losses at lower levels. About 1,500 redundancies are expected by year-end.
The investment bank has reported it expects third-quarter losses of up to Sfr800 million, mainly due to investments tied to subprime assets.
Marcel Rohner, chief executive of UBS, says: "Our first quarterly loss in nine years is an unsatisfactory result, especially after such a strong first half. I have therefore taken decisive action to be as transparent as possible."
UBS's losses outstripped those of its rivals "because we are overweight in the US subprime market, with much higher volumes in a market that has for many years had low volatility," says Rohner.
Senior departures include chairman Huw Jenkins. Rohner now takes the wheel. Jenkins will serve as an adviser to Rohner, who has only been chief executive since Peter Wuffli left in July. Mark Suter, executive vice-chairman, replaces Clive Standish as CFO and Walter Stuerzinger, group chief risk officer, is the new chief operating officer, corporate centre.
UBS had already closed its hedge fund operation, Dillon Read Capital Management, after Sfr380 million in subprime losses. Its approach to write-downs has been equally ruthless. Rohner says it is comfortable with its "rigorous approach" and, while hoping for better results in Q4, has not ruled out further depreciation. It still holds $19 billion of subprime assets. Some 90% are triple-A rated, and 80% have a weighted average life of less than three years. Rohner welcomes the effect the Fed's 0.5% cut on interest rates might have on the market.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack