US spies in bank monitoring scandal
NEW YORK – George W Bush has hit back at the US media for publishing details of a scheme that allows US law enforcement agencies to monitor international bank transfers.
The New York Times
has revealed that under subpoena powers granted post-9/11, the US government has coerced the Belgium-based Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (Swift) to open its records in a bid to track terrorist financing.The program, initiated and administered by the Central Intelligence Agency, tracked the banking transactions of thousands of Americans and controversially, did not seek court-approved warrants to examine individual transactions but relied on broad administrative subpoenas to justify the trawl.
Belgium has moved quickly to distance itself from the spat, which has seen numerous senior political figures from the Republican Party condemn The New York Times, by insisting all the transactions were monitored from Swift's US subsidiary and that no tracking took place in Belgium. The Belgian government has asked its intelligence services to investigate the affair.
Meanwhile, civil liberties watchdog Privacy International has urged 32 governments to refrain from releasing confidential banking information to US investigators, claiming this to be "completely unacceptable".
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities