Cost of US ID theft falling
A new Federal Trade Commission report estimates 4% of Americans were victims of identity theft in 2005, but the cost is going down
NEW YORK – A new Federal Trade Commission (FTC) report says US losses from ID fraud came to $15.6 billion in 2005, down from $47.6 billion in the 2003 report.
The study also says 8.3 million Americans, or 3.6% of US adults, were victims of identity fraud in 2005 – down from 4.6% in the previous study.
The survey was carried out between March and June 2006 and was based on 4,917 telephone interviews, although changes in methodology from the previous study made the FTC reluctant to embrace the significance of its own figures.
Some 56% of participants had no idea how fraudsters got hold of their personal details. Only 1% blamed computer hacking and another 1% phishing scams.
Results said a third of ID theft victims had suffered abuse of their credit card, with most of the remainder occurring on non-credit card accounts.
The FTC says most victims did not report any cost of ID theft, although 10% said it cost them at least $1,200.
The cost in time and money were higher for thefts where the fraudsters set up new accounts – with the average theft rising from under $500 to $1,350 where new accounts had been created.
The FTC highlighted the cost in time caused by ID theft – four hours on average and 130 hours for 5% of people.
Credit problems, inability to access accounts and harassment by bailiffs were reported by 37% of respondents.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”