PwC accounting firm grounded in Tokyo
TOKYO – PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) suffered embarrassment in Japan this month when the Tokyo office of the accounting firm – Chuo Aoyama PricewaterhouseCoopers – was suspended from doing business for two months by the nation's Financial Services Agency.
The suspension was a result of the firm's work for a client, cosmetics and textiles manufacturer Kanebo, where a significant fraud has been uncovered. PwC's Japan office has been barred from auditing corporate accounts under Japan's securities and commercial laws for two months, beginning July 1.
Three of PwC's accountants have been charged in connection with the Kanebo fraud, after they admitted helping the company hide losses as part of a nine-year effort to disguise the true state of its finances. The company has been broken up and parts of the business have been sold to competitor firms.
While the ban on PwC won't impede the work the firm is currently doing on clients' March 31 year-end results, it is a huge blow to the accounting firm. The FSA said the accounting firm's failure to detect and prevent the fraud was a result of "serious deficiencies" in internal controls. Many Japanese clients are expected to abandon the firm in the coming months once this year's results are done and dusted.
PwC, meanwhile, has swung into full fighback action. According to press reports, it sent Andrew Popham, a senior partner, out to Tokyo to handle the aftermath of the temporary ban. Also, the firm announced that it is setting up a new affiliated firm that will be adopting "international best practices in accounting and auditing".
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
AI governance rules coming soon, says CFTC chair
Selig doesn’t want to stifle innovation, but says trading or advice algos will need guardrails
For Esma the supervisor, people power will be prime
Industry hopes to avoid people risk during transition, with help from national authorities
Basel III endgame: overall relief hides winners and losers
G-Sibs gain from surcharge reform while AOCI hits regional banks
One thing missing from US Basel III proposal: a deadline
Without a deadline, risk teams will struggle to secure resources to begin implementation projects
In simplifying credit risk models, EBA could compound capital costs
Skipping hard yards of internal ratings-based approach might trip higher capital charges and implementation costs
Change fatigue could dim EBA’s credit risk simplicity drive
Revisions may be kept to a minimum as short-term implementation burden weighs on banks
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules