
PwC accounting firm grounded in Tokyo
LOSSES & LAWSUITS
The suspension was a result of the firm's work for a client, cosmetics and textiles manufacturer Kanebo, where a significant fraud has been uncovered. PwC's Japan office has been barred from auditing corporate accounts under Japan's securities and commercial laws for two months, beginning July 1.
Three of PwC's accountants have been charged in connection with the Kanebo fraud, after they admitted helping the company hide losses as part of a nine-year effort to disguise the true state of its finances. The company has been broken up and parts of the business have been sold to competitor firms.
While the ban on PwC won't impede the work the firm is currently doing on clients' March 31 year-end results, it is a huge blow to the accounting firm. The FSA said the accounting firm's failure to detect and prevent the fraud was a result of "serious deficiencies" in internal controls. Many Japanese clients are expected to abandon the firm in the coming months once this year's results are done and dusted.
PwC, meanwhile, has swung into full fighback action. According to press reports, it sent Andrew Popham, a senior partner, out to Tokyo to handle the aftermath of the temporary ban. Also, the firm announced that it is setting up a new affiliated firm that will be adopting "international best practices in accounting and auditing".
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
SEC may lack legal clout to impose new dealer rule – Citadel
Adoption of quantitative dealer definition may require congressional changes to US Securities Exchange Act
US Basel endgame hits clearing with op risk capital charges
Dealers also fret about unlevel playing field compared with requirements in the EU
CFTC’s clearing house recovery rule splits industry
Some fear CCPs will fast-track recovery, others say any rule book will be ignored in emergency
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether
The Fed’s stress test models are inaccurate. Something has to change
First step for US regulator to improve its bank loss forecasts would be to open up its models to public scrutiny, argue two banking industry advocates