SEC cracks down on Spear & Jackson pump-and-dump scheme
WINTER PARK, FLORIDA – The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) alleges that Florida-based Park Financial Group and its principal, Gordon Cantley, aided and abetted and caused a pump-and-dump scheme involving the securities of Spear & Jackson. The company also failed to file required suspicious activity reports (SARs).
The SEC has begun administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings against the company and its principal. It has already obtained injunctive relief against Dennis Crowley, the former chief executive officer of Spear & Jackson, for violations of the anti-fraud, registration and reporting provisions of the federal securities laws in connection with his role in the pump-and-dump scheme in 2005.
A pump-and-dump scheme, also known as hype and dump manipulation, involves the touting of a company's stock through false and misleading statements to the market-place. After pumping the stock, fraudsters make huge profits by selling their cheap stock into the market.
The cease-and-desist order alleges that between February 2002 and July 2003, Park, a registered broker-dealer with a disciplinary history, and Cantley executed numerous trades in Spear & Jackson stock, despite obvious red flags, for three companies located in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) Companies, which Crowley secretly controlled. Specifically, on several occasions, Crowley gave Park and Cantley sell orders for the BVI Companies' accounts. Park and Cantley filled these orders, even though each of these foreign-based accounts, which were rare for Park, required the written approval of at least two authorised individuals before any transaction could occur, and Crowley was not an authorised signatory.
Moreover, Park and Cantley executed Crowley's trades knowing he was the chief executive officer of Spear & Jackson, and that the BVI companies' accounts traded exclusively in Spear & Jackson stock, often buying and selling shares on a daily basis. Park and Cantley also knew that the BVI Companies were transferring large amounts of Spear & Jackson stock to a stock promoter, which was actively promoting Spear & Jackson, and Spear & Jackson's stock price was sharply increasing. During the relevant time period, Park and Cantley executed more than 200 trades in Spear & Jackson stock for the BVI Companies' accounts, which generated approximately $2.5 million in proceeds.
Park also failed to report suspicious transactions in Spear & Jackson stock by filing SARs with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, as required by regulations implementing the Bank Secrecy Act.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion
Iosco chief sees no need for CCPs to hold more capital
CCPs have shown resilience in volatile times without extra skin-in-the-game, says Buenaventura
Banks urge EBA to delay risk benchmarking amid Iran conflict
Risk managers say hypothetical portfolio exercise clashes with severe market turbulence
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie