
UK Banks in the dock over 'unfair' fees
LOSSES & LAWSUITS
Those disputing the case include banks HBOS, Lloyds TSB, HSBC, Clydesdale Bank, Barclays, Abbey National and the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), and building society Nationwide. They argue the legislation does not apply to their charges on unauthorised overdrafts or bounced cheques, and are throwing a lot of legal muscle behind their defence.
Laurence Rabinowitz QC, representing RBS, opened the proceedings by accusing the OFT of partly being to blame for opening a floodgate to consumer claims against penalty fees that, according to research released in July last year by Credit Suisse UK, cost banks as much as £200 million.
He said this was partly due to "ill-judged" comments by the OFT in its ruling on credit card charges in 2006, which said that credit card providers were charging unfair fees for late and missed payments, and compared them with charges imposed on current accounts such as those for unauthorised overdrafts.
Barclays, represented by Iain Milligan QC, concurred with the RBS defence that anything related to the price of running a current account could not be challenged under consumer regulations, that overdraft services were part and parcel of the bank's arrangements for operating customers' current accounts, and that Barclays' current account terms and conditions were "plain and intelligible".
The other firms are continuing their defence, after which the OFT is expected to reply at length. The hearing is expected to run until mid-February, almosttwo weeks past the initially scheduled eight days.
If the OFT is successful, it could mean the end of free banking, as banks attempt to recoup costs elsewhere.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Market blocked in by volume caps on European DLT regime
Limited scope of pilot project risks holding back issuer and depository participation
SVB opens floodgates on liquidity buffers debate
European regulator says HQLAs should be booked at fair value, but not everyone agrees
SEC cyber rules risk creating web of confusion and costs
Proposals would require breach notifications, public disclosures and annual cyber assessments
Indonesia readies close-out netting after passing P2SK Law
Bankruptcy law changes remove close-out netting obstacles
Top 10 operational risks: The umpire strikes back
Tougher regulatory enforcement, new consumer rules and rise of ESG are ringing alarm bells
Behnam comments fan JSCC hopes for US client clearing
Japan clearing exec welcomes CFTC chair’s pledge to keep discussing OTC clearing status for non-US houses
SVB wouldn’t happen in Europe, says Deutsche CIB head
Campelli also thinks Credit Suisse’s bailed-in AT1 bonds acted as originally intended