FSA introduces deposit guarantee compensation rules
The UK regulator creates a scheme to hasten compensation payouts
LONDON - The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) is introducing new rules for the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) aimed at broadening the number of people protected and requiring banks, building societies and credit unions to pay out compensation more quickly if an institution defaults.
Consumers and small businesses will receive compensation within a target of seven days, and within a maximum period of 20 days, in compliance with the European Union's Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive. The new rules will come into force on December 31, 2010.
The rules also mean that if a depositor has savings and loans with the same firm, an outstanding loan or debt cannot be deducted from the gross payment, which must now be paid in full, up to the maximum £50,000 depositor protection ceiling.
From January 1, 2010 banks and firms will also have to publish information on the FSCS and their compliance with it to customers, as well as having to disclose to customers additional trading names under which the firm operates.
"The FSA, along with HM Treasury and Bank of England, have set the FSCS a challenging target of delivering payout in seven days," said Hector Sants, chief executive of the FSA. "The systems requirements that the rules introduce for banks are crucial to enable the FSCS to deliver fast payout."
Other key requirements include that firms must keep up-to-date information on customers to allow quick processing of claims by the FSCS if needed, described as a "single customer view".
The regulator decided to extend, until December 30, 2010, interim rules to allow separate compensation cover for customers with deposits in two merging building societies, as well as for customers of a building society that merges with a subsidiary of another mutual society, and for customers whose deposits are transferred from a failed firm to another deposit taker with whom they already have an account.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
European banks search for consensus on credit spread risk
New EBA guidelines spawn diverging interpretations of which products must be assessed for CSRBB
Dutch regulator in new push on algo manipulation
AFM teams up with Oxford Uni academics to develop data models that will identify “harmful” collusion in automated trading
Fed relief plan for G-Sib agency clearing welcomed
Rollback may revive interest in European FCM model, as principal clearing still treated punitively
Indian initial margin launch brings operational headaches
Conglomerates with multiple entities trading derivatives pose compliance challenges for dealers
Fed’s new liquidity rule spells more pain for regional banks
Limit on HTM assets follows move to deduct unrealised losses from capital buffers
Ruled out: can regulators settle the pre-hedging debate?
Market participants are at odds over the practice and whether regulation or principles can settle the score
SEC streamlines overhaul of stock trading rules
Tick size and access fee rules simplified from first draft, but Peirce still questions rationale
Supervisors use generative AI to tame ‘chaotic’ data
Officials merge credit databases with unstructured reports to sharpen bank oversight, explains Banco de España ex-deputy