Disruption versus conviction
EDITOR’S LETTER / ELLEN DAVIS
Is the current anti-money laundering regime working? This is the question financial institution executives, and others, are beginning to ask. While there is no doubt that national regulators are successful at increasing compliance at financial services firms – the substantial fines are powerfully convincing – some questions are beginning to arise about the strategy overall.
In the UK, for example, most financial crime experts acknowledge a lack of resources for fighting financial crime at the coal face – within local policing organisations. A number of large national bodies have been set up over the past three years, but critics say these are targeting the ‘disruption’ of crime, not convictions.
And in the US and the UK, firms are frustrated that their suspicious activity reports don’t seem to be used for catching criminals. They fear they are filed away in computerised archives, never to be heard from again.
But there are other problems. Early academic studies show that the AML regime’s strictness is exacerbating financial exclusion. Some fear these excluded individuals will turn to either informal or black market service providers, and become victims of crime themselves.
It is still early days in the global fight against money laundering and financial crime. But regulators and firms have a duty to make sure – not just to themselves but also to society – their efforts bear fruit.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Banks will not be frowned upon for discount window borrowing – Fed official
Risk Live: more banks have completed paperwork to access Fed lending facility than a year ago
Capital One puts OCC’s tough stance on mergers to the test
Proposed Discover deal should be approved but will go under the microscope, ex-regulators say
As FCMs dwindle, regulators fear systemic risk
Panellists highlight dangers of clearing membership becoming more concentrated
EU banks fear green asset ratios paint an unfair picture
Industry lobbyist clashes with lawmaker over usefulness of new sustainability disclosure
EU watchdogs to launch prop trader capital review in April
Prop traders say bank-style IFR rules are driving them out, but doubt EBA will suggest changes
Investors say new SEC disclosures may sit on shelf
Advisory committee questions value of rule 605 changes, even for retail investors
CFTC hears ‘call to action’ from swaps end-users on Basel III
Commissioner Pham mulls engaging with prudential regulators over capital hit on clearing
Iosco gears up for ‘intensive work’ on AI regulation
Watchdogs risk ‘falling behind the curve’, secretary-general warns; FSB also working on guidance
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Regulators’ FRTB estimates based on faulty premise – industry study
- As FCMs dwindle, regulators fear systemic risk