Cebs stresses simplicity and communication in report on liquidity buffers
An interim report from Cebs gives preliminary views on developing liquidity survival periods, buffers and the assets they should contain
LONDON - The Committee of European Banking Supervisors (Cebs) has released an interim report highlighting the need for a simple and open approach to developing liquidity buffers and survival periods. The report is Cebs' response to a request from the Economic and Financial Committee and is part of the follow-up to Cebs 30 recommendations on liquidity risk management released in September 2008.
Cebs highlights the diversity of approaches to liquidity buffers across European Union national supervisors, and suggests a simple approach well communicated between stakeholders will allow for flexibility across the great breadth and complexity of institutions in the region.
Preliminary views are offered on steering the banking industry's approach to calibrating and determining the size and composition of liquidity buffers over a range of set time periods, in addition to taking stock of factors such as currency and differing legal jurisdictions. The proposals are the result of dialogue conducted through Cebs' Industry Expert Group on Liquidity.
Cebs says a liquidity buffer is dependent upon three dimenstions: the severity of stress scenarios, the time horizon determined as a 'survival period', and the characteristics of the assets in the buffer.
The report "tentatively" suggests one month is an adequate survival period. Assets used in a buffer should be highly liquid - convertible to cash "immediately or within a very short time". Banks should be able to closely estimate the amount of liquidity the assets can generate, through using haircuts when necessary.
Further work will try to determine the size of buffer necessary and the asset types it should contain. These refined proposals will be laid out in a consultation paper that Cebs says it will bring out in mid-2009.
The interim report can be read here.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Already under FRTB, some banks hope for modelling reprieve
Risk Live: BMO and UBS opted for SA, but believe regulators could still opt to follow softer US rules
Regulators better prepared for next Credit Suisse, says SRB head
FSB strengthening guidance on international co-operation, but EU needs more mutual support
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins