FSA letter warns mortgage firms to treat customers fairly
Mortgage firms asked to review arrears and repossessions practice by UK regulator
The letter is the second warning to lenders from the FSA in recent months. It comes in light of its earlier review which found weaknesses in arrears and repossessions handling, particularly in the impaired credit sector of the market, and the fact that increasing numbers of households are at risk of repossession.
"Conditions in the mortgage market are difficult and it seems likely that these conditions will persist for some time," says Jon Pain, FSA retail managing director. "In such a challenging operating environment, it is particularly important for senior management to ensure the fair treatment of customers, including when they go into arrears."
"The fair treatment of consumers in arrears will continue to be a priority for the FSA throughout 2009. Where we find that lenders are not complying with our requirements we will make appropriate and properly targeted use of our existing regulatory tools, which may include enforcement action," he added.
The letter states that the FSA expects the senior management of mortgage lenders and administrators to critically review current arrears policy; critically review current management practices and procedures; and assess whether, in practice, borrowers in arrears are being treated fairly by initiating a review of a sample of cases to assess whether the FSA's requirements are being met.
The FSA expects firms to address any weaknesses as a matter of urgency and chief executives must communicate conclusions and any actions the firm proposes to take to the FSA by January 31, 2009.
Click here for the letter
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance