Technology offers 40% AML saving, says study
A new white paper says firms can improve AML efficiency through advanced technology
NEW YORK – Financial services firms could reduce anti-money laundering (AML) costs by up to 40% by introducing more advanced technology, according to new research by US risk and compliance technology firm Fortent.
The white paper, Taking Costs Out of Compliance: Smart Ways to Boost Your Operation’s Return on Investment, says although the cost of compliance technology to financial services firms is perceived to be high, sustaining the higher cost of investigations and filing suspicious activity reports drains a greater share of compliance budgets.
“CEOs, expense chiefs, operations officers, and compliance directors can derive immediate value and return on investment while at the same time achieving more rigorous compliance standards for regulators,” says Michael Recce, Fortent’s chief scientist and the study’s author.
The paper suggests three steps to lowering the cost of AML technology. The first is the reduction of data silos that might have become more pronounced through firms’ organic growth or acquisitions. More dynamic profiling to reduce a tendency to produce false positives of older rules-based technologies is also recommended. Lastly, the study suggests turning pattern-recognition technologies towards detecting financial crimes such as insider fraud.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion