CEBS addresses Basel II implementation issues
New paper relates range of practices on Basel II implementation
LONDON – The Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS) has published a paper entitled Range of practices on some Basel II implementation issues, which has specific cross-border relevance.
CEBS focuses on providing advice on the implementation and practical application of European Community legislation and CEBS guidelines. It also focuses on practical convergence in the day-to-day application of this legislation and these guidelines to cross-border business.
In the past year, CEBS has been collecting and analysing information about the Basel II implementation issues cross-border banking groups and their supervisors believe to be the most challenging. Some of the issues have directly been raised by the Industry Platform on Operational Networks; others have been raised by supervisors based on the experience they have gained so far. The CEBS paper looks into the most important issues analysed so far, providing a concrete answer for some and for others listing a catalogue of pragmatic approaches that, based on the experience both of supervisors and banking groups, seem to be broadly consistent.
The approaches identified in the paper are real-life examples of specific applications of the Capital Requirements Directive and CEBS guidelines to the banking groups represented in the sample of banks taking part in the work of CEBS in relation to operational networking. As a result, they are not intended to be generalised solutions or to be read by institutions as a limitation on the identification of approaches that might be better suited to their specific needs.
Click here for a copy of the paper.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion
Iosco chief sees no need for CCPs to hold more capital
CCPs have shown resilience in volatile times without extra skin-in-the-game, says Buenaventura